1K$ Deposit SageSwap: Private Monero & Bitcoin Exchange - No JavaScript, No KYC

Trêvoid

TrêvoidTrêvoid is verified member.

No KYC / AML
Staff member
Administrative
SageSwap.io is a crypto-to-crypto exchange that accepts Monero and Bitcoin, works on both Tor and the regular web, and operates without JavaScript. The platform guarantees a strict no‑KYC policy and scores 8/10 overall based on 11 user ratings (average 5/5).

SageSwap.io - Fast Crypto Swap


Summary
  • Service: sageswap.io
  • Supported: Monero, Bitcoin and others.
  • KYC: Guaranteed no-KYC (terms state KYC will never be requested)
  • Interfaces: Tor and clearnet; no JavaScript required
  • User ratings: 11 reviews, average 5/5
  • Score: 8/10 (Overall); Privacy 100/100 (Excellent); https://kycnot.me/service/sageswap-io

Official Links

Clearnet: https://sageswap.io
Web Mirror: https://sageswap.cc
Tor Mirror: http://sageswap4ygi7k5e5gbnvhz2ldbprrelkkuourlp5vx6flfeypk4hvqd.onion
API: https://docs.sageswap.io/

Note to the community from Trêvoid​

Service launched ~6 months ago; limited track record use cautiously and follow safe-swapping practices. We've received $1,000 in security deposits from SageSwap after advertising on Bitcointalk. In our next post, I'll explain how our active intermediary system works.

Best regards,
— Trêvoid
 
With security deposit, I Trêvoid acting as an active intermediary, instead of holding a deposit to be distributed after a disaster, I am integrating the escrow into the workflow.

Batch Execution: By splitting a large transaction into smaller, manageable chunks (for example according to security deposits I have $2,000 - with $10k I split into 5 swaps), I limit the blast radius. If the service stops responding, the remaining pending swaps remain in our control, effectively protecting the user from the full loss.

Addressing the "Exit Scam" Risk: To prevent the scammer from reclaiming their own escrow via fake victims. Since I am the active intermediary, I hold the "source of truth." I do not need to rely on users to report a scam. If anything goes wrong, I will make everything public and create scam accusations.

I believe that active middleman is significantly more effective than traditional escrow. It transforms the security deposit from a penalty fund into a live insurance policy , allowing me to act as a gatekeeper rather than an adjudicator.

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5567401.msg66826464#msg66826464

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I confirm on behalf of SageSwap.io (OP) that I hold 2.7 XMR (at today's rate, approximately $1,000). This is Trêvoid from bitcointalk.org. I do not have an escrow fee.

My PGP public key is published at:

█ CRYPTO ⇄ CRYPTO █ Secure & Private No-KYC-AML Crypto Swaps (Monero XMR & ZEC)

█ CRYPTO ⇄ CRYPTO █ Secure & Private No-KYC-AML Crypto Swaps (Monero XMR & ZEC)
bitcointalk.org
Please use this key to verify this guarantee of letter.

PGP Fingerprint: F642 642B 1E73 F786 7AD3 EA0D 8E63 A6E0 D659 B2CC

Latest Bitcoin block is: 0000000000000000000177ed33a695aaa6b239bdc51ed13ff4a6d544ebdd1c1c

Regards,
Trêvoid
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iJEEARYKADkWIQT2QmQrHnP3hnrT6g2OY6bg1lmyzAUCaiuglRsUgAAAAAAEAA5t
YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMiwyLDEACgkQjmOm4NZZssxrWQEAnU2vip5QgSDI4L5LaHP3
Q7M1v0bjNsWPWPi4GTXr13cA/ibAQb5lKly/bXL4q8pEFwLpwaD8UxZPJHBDyipL
9GcN
=alcY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Click to expand...

Mandatory Enrollment for Protection​

To be eligible for reimbursement from the security deposit in the event of a scam, frozen order, or service failure, the following conditions must be met:
  • SimpleX Contact: Users must contact us via our official SimpleX address before initiating the transaction.
  • Active Intermediary Engagement: The transaction must have been processed through us as the designated middleman.
  • Non-Eligibility Clause: Any users who interact with the SageSwap directly bypassing our intermediary service do so at their own risk and are not eligible for coverage from the security deposit.
Best regards,
— Trêvoid
 
The user agrees to send the full amount to avoid misunderstandings and to prevent the use of a higher fee to exchange a smaller amount than planned.

The user may request a Letter of Guarantee upon request, if necessary.

Info: Manual swaps are conducted ONLY above $250.000
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, but in that case, you'll have to wait until we finish our technical break. We only process manual swaps for amounts of $250,000 or more.

Smaller amounts can only be processed through our website.
Click to expand...

Sage messages on Telegram. I’m not sure what their intentions are, but it could be a scam don’t deposit funds off-site.
 
Hemps3n said:
Manual swaps for 250k isn't much ?? your thread doesn't mention it.
Click to expand...
Did I write somewhere that $250,000 isn't much?

Thread doesn't mention it because we don't process these transactions very often, and about 99.99% of people can't even afford such a transaction, we only process them for people who have large amounts and want to pay lower fees.

When we engage in such exchanges, we focus more on long term cooperation with these individuals.
 
SageSwap said:
Did I write somewhere that $250,000 isn't much?

Thread doesn't mention it because we don't process these transactions very often, and about 99.99% of people can't even afford such a transaction, we only process them for people who have large amounts and want to pay lower fees.

When we engage in such exchanges, we focus more on long term cooperation with these individuals.
Click to expand...
Also, why is it on manual? And Telegram doesn’t feel safe to use you can delete messages so quickly.
 
yall niggas be like yeah bro, you can scam us on telegram, like he couldnt scam yall on website ONLY TRU WEBSITE IS SAFE!!!!!!!!!!

what a bums
 
SageSwap said:
I answered this question in a previous post.

How would you like us to delete the Letter of Guarantee signed with our PGP key?

So, which is safer? Meeting in person?
Click to expand...
I’m just asking about the safety of messaging apps in a calm, straightforward way, but you seem angry. People often say Telegram isn’t safe, while Signal is safer what’s the reasoning?
 
SpongeBob said:
yall niggas be like yeah bro, you can scam us on telegram, like he couldnt scam yall on website ONLY TRU WEBSITE IS SAFE!!!!!!!!!!

what a bums
Click to expand...
It could be either do you mean to ask whether they intended it to be safe to use, or whether it just happened to be safe?
 
requirs said:
I’m just asking about the safety of messaging apps in a calm, straightforward way, but you seem angry. People often say Telegram isn’t safe, while Signal is safer what’s the reasoning?
Click to expand...
I'm not angry.

Is Signal more secure? I don't know about that, you have to provide your phone number, the servers are centralized, it forces you to log in from your phone every two weeks or else it deactivates your account, and probably a lot of other things.

It's not much different from a telegram.

Besides, no one is forcing anyone to use Telegram, we also have Session and email, you can also use PGP key to be safer.
 
SageSwap said:
I'm not angry.

Is Signal more secure? I don't know about that, you have to provide your phone number, the servers are centralized, it forces you to log in from your phone every two weeks or else it deactivates your account, and probably a lot of other things.

It's not much different from a telegram.

Besides, no one is forcing anyone to use Telegram, we also have Session and email, you can also use PGP key to be safer.
Click to expand...
Signal is generally more security-focused than Telegram and uses strong encryption; central servers and phone verification remain, but it’s still safer for most users.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
[XenGenTr] 📊 Forum istatistik sistemi Addon provided by Homicide ©2026